Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Links certainly one of lover identification characteristic resemblance, matchmaking beginning, matchmaking top quality, and love. [ Website links ]
Baxter, L. An excellent., & West, L. (2003). Couple perceptions of its parallels and you can distinctions: An effective dialectical perspective. Diary out-of Personal and you will Personal Dating, 20, 491-514. [ Website links ]
Berscheid, Age. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you will emotion. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may incompatible matchmaking (pp. 143-161). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Berscheid, Age., Dion, K., Walster, Age., & Walster, Grams. W. (1971). Physical elegance and matchmaking choices: An examination of the complimentary theory. Diary from Experimental Social Mindset, 7, 173-189. [ Backlinks ]
Log out-of Personal and private Matchmaking, 24, 479-496
Berscheid, Age., & Regan, P. (2005). The fresh new therapy out-of social matchmaking. Upper Seat Lake, NJ: Pearson Knowledge (Prentice Hallway). [ Links ]
Berger, C. Roentgen. (1975). Task overall performance and attributional interaction while the determinants out of social attraction. Message Monographs, 40, 280-286. [ Links ]
Berscheid, Elizabeth., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Appeal and close relationship. From inside the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The new manual out-of social mindset (Vol. dos, last ed. Pp. 193-281). Ny: McGraw-Hill. [ Hyperlinks ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2004, Will get eleven). You.S. Patent 6,735,568. Arizona, DC. [ Links ]
Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. Roentgen., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2008, The fall of. 18). U.S. Patent eight,454,357B2. Washington, DC. [ Links ]
Buss, D. Yards. (1984). Relationship diversity getting identity dispositions: Research having three various other data supplies. https://internationalwomen.net/sv/heta-irlandska-kvinnor/ Conclusion Genetics, fourteen, 111-123. [ Links ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, Roentgen. (1965). Magnitude regarding positive and negative reinforcements because the a good determinant out of attraction. Diary regarding Personality and you will Social Psychology, dos, 884-889. [ Links ]
Carter, S. R. (2005, Feb.), For progressive-day Cupids, study changes matchmaking: Emotional technology are at the rear of the latest profitable matches generated during the eHarmony. Association to have Mental Research Observer, 18. Downloaded out-of [ Backlinks ]
Carter, S. R., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Improving spouse alternatives through the internet: An assessment out-of relationships top quality between marriages as a result of an online dating system and you will marriage ceremonies as a result of unfettered choice. Interpersona: A global Log towards Private Relationship, 3, 105-125. [ Hyperlinks ]
Carter, S., & Snowfall, C. (2004, May). Enabling single people get into top marriage ceremonies having fun with predictive type marital triumph. Report exhibited on 16th Yearly Summit of American Mental People. [ Hyperlinks ]
Approach and program to own pinpointing folks who are gonna features a fruitful relationship
C). How come character amount for the ination out-of feature stress, negativity, and you can relationship pleasure. Diary regarding Identification and Public Therapy, 78, 326-336. [ Backlinks ]
Clark, M. S. (1985). Effects of relationships sorts of to have knowledge being compatible. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may incompatible dating (pp. 119-140). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex differences in matchmaking aspiration and you may pleasure that have computers-set up lovers. Diary regarding ily, twenty-eight, 62-66. [ Backlinks ]
Cooper, An effective., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Relationship on the net: Wisdom on the web appeal. Diary out-of Sex Education and Cures, 22, 7-14. [ Website links ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Would somebody understand what they require: A similar or subservient partner? Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 595-602. [ Hyperlinks ]
Feingold, Good. (1988). Coordinating to have appeal when you look at the close partners and you can exact same-sex relatives: A meta-studies and you can theoretic complaints. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Hyperlinks ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Out of popular with terrible: Disenchantment with an enchanting spouse. Sociological Views, forty-two, 263-280. [ Hyperlinks ]
