step one. Yet, inside the genealogy, all of us knowthat for every single rule there is certainly an exception to this rule. A beneficial vexing part ofgenealogy is that no body very understands how to put on brand new exclusions orrules having people definitive adjective for example always, maybe, probably,most likely, an such like. It will be fascinating in the event the around most other instances ofjointures getting generated a year or several immediately after a known wedding go out.
2. Can there be an extant dispensation for the matrimony out-of ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes have been third cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh otherwise next cousins, immediately after removed from the newest 5th LordClifford? Who restrict their relationship go out.
Arthur
Presumably, when the an excellent dispensation try sought for and you can supplied, it can havebeen from the among the many following, and could come in new correspondingregister book, in the event it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop regarding York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop regarding Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop off York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop off Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop of Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop out of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. In the event the 10th Lord Clifford do get married at the beginning of 1487 [say January] andhas Age after in that seasons, really does new chronology maybe not work?
John possession?
Elizabeth produced from inside the later 1487, Henry created within the 1488/nine, Joan inside the ,an such like. completing brand new labels of post out of . In the event that (a) thechronology nevertheless performs; and you may (b) their marriage portion wasn’t reduced; thenwe just have the latest 1505 pedigree off Henry VII’s that is when you look at the oppositionto brand new conjecture that she are a legitimate child.
six. Regarding your 1505 pedigree: Are definitely the Clifford daughters the newest onlyknown Henry VII affairs excluded? Are there others? If so,won’t you to definitely mirror improperly on this document because a source?
Away from comparisons You will find created from the fresh new c.1505 Henry VII Relationships pedigreeswith the brand new 1480-1500 Visitation of North pedigrees, which are
From the c.1505 Relationships pedigrees, the fresh new Clifford children are not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but instead from the St. John pedigree. While the I’mnot used to the latest St. John family unit members, following the ‘s the recommendations asit looks on the c.1505 pedigree, while the obtained from brand new 1834 Coll. Greatest. etGen. post. The latest phrasing in the quotations is precisely since it looks inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).
“No. XII.”Off my personal Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out-of Somerset got around three husbands.” By the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My Lady new King’s Mom.” that has “This new Queen.” whohad “Prince “From the “Sir Oliver Saint John, first husband.” she had 3 daus & dos sons:
Good. “Edith, married to Geoffrey Pole away from Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married for the Woman Margaret, dau. off theDuke of Clarence.” They had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married to Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– klicka fГ¶r att fГҐ veta mer [child, unnamed]. ——-[an alternative child, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He had four people:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” that has “Five daughters and you will oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to help you Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and you will heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Age, wedded to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. off Lincolnshire.”B4. “A good Nun off Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, wedded to Sir Richard Frognall.” They’d:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his awesome brethren and sistren.” That have issueindicated, not titled.C2. “Elizabeth, married in order to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “E, married basic into Lord Zouche; after towards the LordScrope of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [from the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Having issueindicated although not named.
Margaret Duchess out-of Somerset, from the “Lionel Lord Welles, last husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. out of K. Edward IV.” andthey got “E.”
